Title: Beetles offer effective weed control, but native vegetation hard to re-establish
[ScienceDaily Nov. 5, 2010] - With the help of the weed-eating flea beetle, researchers significantly reduced infestations of a non-native plant, leafy spurge, on Montana rangeland. The good news is that this biological method of weed control worked effectively over the course of a 9-year study. The bad news is that rather than native plants returning to flourish in the absence of leafy spurge, other non-native species became dominant in its place.
The study, presented in the journal Rangeland Ecology & Management, sought to evaluate the responses of native vegetation once the invasive species was removed using classic biological control. Black and brown flea beetles have previously been used successfully as biological control agents to manage leafy spurge on a large scale.
In the current study, the weed-eating flea beetles were released in 1998 in southeastern Montana on privately owned land used for cattle grazing. About 6,000 flea beetles were introduced onto 32 plots of leafy spurge, while 20 more plots went untreated. Over time, the beetles dispersed to the untreated plots, suppressing leafy spurge there as well.
Blossoms of leafy spurge, Euphorbia esula. (Credit: USDA)
By the study's end in 2006, leafy spurge foliar cover was reduced 80% to 90% compared to 1998 assessments. While other vegetation did increase once this invader was controlled, another non-native plant, Poa spp., became the dominant species.
Once established, strong invaders like leafy spurge may make the native plant community more susceptible to invasion by other non-native species. Any new infestations should be treated as soon as possible to reduce long-term effects such as contributions to the seed bank, native species loss, and ecosystem modification.
Journal Reference: Jack L. Butler, Stefanie D. Wacker. Lack of Native Vegetation Recovery Following Biological Control of Leafy Spurge. Rangeland Ecology & Management, September 2010, Vol. 63, No. 5, pp. 553-563. DOI: 10.2111/REM-D-09-00075.1
