Title: Regulation of pesticides: A comparative analysis
Abstract: This paper compares three internationally representative regulatory frameworks for pesticides. We look first at the USA, which shifted regulatory powers from the US Department of Agriculture to the Environmental Protection Agency in the early 1970s, during a historical transition from a predominantly economic to a predominantly social regulatory model. The second country is Brazil, currently the world’s largest consumer of pesticides, followed by the USA in second place. In the early 1990s, Brazil’s new regulatory model adopted a troika of decision-making ministries (agriculture, health and environment), with the prevalence of economic over social-environmental interests. The third case is the regulatory framework adopted in 2011 by the EU, where shifts in risk-assessment criteria and corporate financial liability reveal a prevalence of concerns involving social-environmental regulation. [Victor Pelaez, Letícia Rodrigues da Silva & Eduardo Borges Araúj0 (2013). Regulation of pesticides: A comparative analysis. Science & Public Policy, online 04 April.] ${imageDescription} Comment
Keywords: pesticides, regulation, USA, Brazil, European Uniion